HIO-301 resources - Certified HIPAA Security Updated: 2024 | ||||||||
Looking for HIO-301 cheatsheet that works in real exam? | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Exam Code: HIO-301 Certified HIPAA Security resources January 2024 by Killexams.com team | ||||||||
HIO-301 Certified HIPAA Security Exam: HIO-301 (Certified HIPAA Security) Exam Details: - Number of Questions: The exam consists of multiple-choice questions. - Time: Candidates are typically given a specified amount of time to complete the exam. Course Outline: The Certified HIPAA Security (CHS) course is designed to provide candidates with in-depth knowledge and skills related to the security aspects of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations. The course outline includes the following topics: 1. Introduction to HIPAA Security - Overview of HIPAA Security Rule - Security standards and requirements - Roles and responsibilities 2. Administrative Safeguards - Security management process - Risk analysis and risk management - Security policies and procedures 3. Physical Safeguards - Facility access controls - Workstation and device security - Disposal of PHI 4. Technical Safeguards - Access controls and user authentication - Audit controls and monitoring - Encryption and data protection 5. Incident Response and Disaster Recovery - Incident response planning - Business continuity and disaster recovery planning - Security incident handling Exam Objectives: The HIO-301 exam aims to assess candidates' knowledge and skills in implementing and maintaining HIPAA security measures to protect electronic protected health information (ePHI). The exam objectives include: 1. Understanding the requirements and provisions of the HIPAA Security Rule. 2. Applying administrative safeguards to manage security risks and establish policies and procedures. 3. Implementing physical safeguards to protect facilities and devices that store or transmit ePHI. 4. Utilizing technical safeguards to control access, monitor systems, and protect ePHI. 5. Developing incident response and disaster recovery plans to address security incidents and ensure business continuity. Exam Syllabus: The exam syllabus covers the following topics: - Introduction to HIPAA Security - Administrative Safeguards - Physical Safeguards - Technical Safeguards - Incident Response and Disaster Recovery Candidates are expected to have a comprehensive understanding of these courses and demonstrate their ability to apply HIPAA security measures effectively. The exam assesses their knowledge, practical skills, and proficiency in implementing and maintaining HIPAA security compliance. | ||||||||
Certified HIPAA Security HIPAA Certified resources | ||||||||
Other HIPAA examsHIO-201 Certified HIPAA ProfessionalHIO-301 Certified HIPAA Security | ||||||||
Is your objective to pass HIO-301 HIO-301 exam without wasting time and money? Our HIO-301 brain dumps are designed to achieve this goal. Our HIO-301 HIO-301 dumps PDF files contain valid and up to date HIO-301 braindumps Questions Answers that are required to pass the HIO-301 exam at very first attempt. Just register and get the HIO-301 files. | ||||||||
HIPAA HIO-301 Certified HIPAA Security https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/HIO-301 Question: 108 This field in an X.509 digital certificate identifies that each certificate issued by a particular Certificate Authority is unique: A. Kerberos ticket ID B. PA ID number C. CA ID number D. Sender ID E. Serial number Answer: E Question: 109 Which the most widely accepted format for digital certificates is: A. BOOTP B. X.599 C. Phage.963 D. Vapor.741 E. ASCX12 Answer: B Question: 110 An example of a major VPN tunneling protocol is: A. Vapor.741 B. L2TP C. MD5 D. TCP/IP E. PKI Answer: E Question: 111 A hospital is setting up a wireless network using Wi-Ei technology to enable nurses to feed information through it onto the corporate server instead of using traditional 34 paper forms. As a HIPAA security specialist, what would you do as the first step towards, protecting the wireless communication? A. Set up a message digest infrastructure to enable secure communication. B. Configure intrusion detection software on the firewall system. C. Protect the wireless network through installation of a firewall. D. Enable use of WEP keys that are generated dynamically upon user authentication. E. Configure TCP/IP, with a static IP address for all the clients having gateway address of the server.. Answer: A Question: 112 Dr. Alice needs to send patient Bob a prescription electronically. Dr. Alice wants to send the message such that Bob can be sure that the sender of the prescription was in fact Dr. Alice. Dr. Alice decides to encrypt the message as well as include her digital signature. What key will Bob use to be able to decrypt the session key used by Dr. Alice? A. Dr. Alices private key B. Dr. Alices public key C. Bobs public key D. Bobs private key E. Dr. Alices session key Answer: D Question: 113 Statement 1: A firewall is one or more systems, that may be a combination of hardware and software that serves as a security mechanism to prevent unauthorized access between trusted and un-trusted networks. Statement 2: A firewall refers to a gateway that restricts the flow of information between the external Internet and the internal network. Statement 3: Firewall systems can protect against attacks that do not pass through its network interlaces. A. Statement 1 is TRUE, Statement 2 is TRUE and Statement 3 is TRUE B. Statement 1 is TRUE, Statement 2 is TRUE and Statement 3 is FALSE C. Statement 1 is TRUE, Statement 2 is FALSE and Statement 3 is TRUE D. Statement 1 is FALSE, Statement 2 is TRUE and Statement 3 is TRUE E. Statement I is FALSE, Statement 2 is FALSE and Statement 3 is TRUE 35 Answer: B Question: 114 During your discussions with one of the clients, you need to explain the meaning of a Virtual Private Network. Select the best definition: A. A VPN enables a group of two or more computer systems or networks, such as between a hospital and a clinic, to communicate securely over a public network, such as the Internet. B. A VPN is used within the organization only and a firewall is needed to communicate with the external network. C. A VPN requires a private dedicated communication between the two end points. D. A VPN may exist between an individual machine and a private network but, never between a machine on a private network and a remote network. E. A VPN is a real private network as opposed to a virtual network. Answer: A Question: 115 This is one of the areas defined in the ISO 17799 Security Standard. A. Operational policy B. Risk analysis C. Computer and network management D. Application management E. Security procedures Answer: C Question: 116 A hospital has contracted with Lornas firm for the processing of statement generation and payment activities of its patients. At the end of the day, the hospital sends three different files to Lorna, one having new charges, the second one having updated addresses of the patients and third one having information related to payments received. The hospital wants to implement a secured method of transmission of these files to Lornas firm. What would be the best option for the hospital? A. Implement a Virtual Private Network (VPN) between the hospital and Lornas firm and support it with strong authentication. 36 B. Audit Lornas firm every quarter and check all log files. C. Deploy intrusion detection software on Lornas network. D. Encrypt the files and then send it in a CD E. Send the source data files in a CD via courier in the evening. Answer: A Question: 117 CORRECT TEXT Statement 1: The IEEE 802.1 lb standards for wireless network define two types of authentication methods, Open and Shared key. Statement 2: The range of Wi-Fi products is within 30 feet of the router. Statement 3: A VPN can be setup over a wireless network A. Statement 1 is TRUE, Statement 2 is TRUE and Statement 3 is TRUE B. Statement 1 is TRUE, Statement 2 is TRUE and Statement 3 is FALSE C. Statement 1 is TRUE, Statement 2 is FALSE and Statement 3 is TRUE D. Statement I is FALSE, Statement 2 is TRUE and Statement 3 is FALSE E. Configure Statement 1 is TRUE, Statement 2 is FALSE and Statement 3 is FALSE Answer: C Question: 118 The CTQ of a clearinghouse wants to implement a security mechanism that can alert the systems administrator about any hacker attempting to break into the electronic PHI processing server system. As a security advisor to the OTO, what mechanism would you recommend? Select the best answer. A. Deploying a VPN. B. Deploy SSL for all connections to the server. C. Installing an IDS solution on the server. D. Deploying a PRI solution. E. Installing a firewall to allow pass through traffic only to the allowed network address. Answer: C 37 For More exams visit https://killexams.com/vendors-exam-list Kill your exam at First Attempt....Guaranteed! | ||||||||
We are actively building on-campus certification opportunities for their pre-health students. For the academic year, 2023-2024 on-campus training and courses they will have: EMT Certification Through a generous collaboration with Mission College and the Cowell Health Center, they are offering an online lecture course with an in-person skills lab on SCUâs campus. This course will be offered in the Fall and Winter/Spring to provide EMT training for 50 students per year. With their own EMT equipped laboratory, they can dramatically increase the number of students that can complete this training and have a resource for recertification as well. Check the Health Professions Camino page or email Dr. McNelis for more information. CPR BLS Through a collaboration with Santa Clara Fire Department and the SCU EMT Squad, they will be offering CPR BLS certification starting this academic year. Since most healthcare experiential opportunities require CPR certification, they want to provide ready access for certification and recertification for their students to support clinical placement opportunities. Check the Health Professions Camino page or email Dr. McNelis for more information. On-campus certification training such as EMT empowers their students for securing meaningful clinical experience while at SCU and for post-graduate opportunities. We are seeking additional collaborations to bring more medical certification training to campus. Online Certifications In addition, they are identifying on-line healthcare professional training that healthcare organizations require (or encourage) for their care providers. Having their students complete low-cost online HIPAA certification and Implicit bias training prepares their students to be most effective in clinical settings during their undergraduate years and in their future healthcare careers. Other On-Campus training We are exploring training opportunities that will ensure that their students are functioning effectively in their work in clinical placements and post-graduation employment experiences. For example, they are offering an Intermediate Spanish for Healthcare course starting Winter and Spring quarters in 2024.
Learn more about choosing a career in emergency medicine or get information about an emergency medicine residency. Is Emergency Medicine for Me?Throughout the course of medical school, youâre faced with the challenging task of deciding what part of medicine is right for them. To help you decide which specialty is right for you, we've provided a few resources. Check out the links below to see if life in the emergency room is right for you as well as some suggestions on how to pursue a career in emergency medicine. Emergency Medicine Interest GroupThe purpose of the Emergency Medicine Interest Group is to provide information to those contemplating a career in emergency medicine. Through monthly lunch meetings, shadowing opportunities, community learning experiences (ambulance and ARCH helicopter ride-alongs), and workshops, they hope to foster the interest in emergency medicine. These events are open to all students at the Saint Louis University School of Medicine. If you can't find the information you are looking for, feel free to email us and we'll do their best to address your questions. Be sure and check out the calendar for the upcoming events. These events are open to all students at the Saint Louis University School of Medicine. For general information, contact MSII Emergency Medicine Interest Group leaders. Emergency Medicine ShadowingShadow in the Emergency Department of SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital or SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center. Shadowing in a Level I Emergency Department can be a very rewarding experience. They recommend that all students considering a career in emergency medicine try shadowing at least twice. Emergency Department Observation GuidelinesOnly one medical student is permitted in each Emergency Department (SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Childrenâs Hospital or SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital) for observation during available shifts. All students must have:
Check with Therese Friederich in the Office of Curricular Affairs to see if you have all the requirements. For information on Emergency Department shadowing, contact EmergencyMedicine@health.slu.edu or call 314-977-1919. On December 13, 2023, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) issued the Health Data, Technology, and Interoperability: Certification Program Updates, Algorithm Transparency, and Information Sharing (HTI-1) final rule to update ONC Health IT Certification Program requirements and amend the information blocking regulations that ONC issued under the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act). The HTI-1 final rule substantially finalizes policies that ONC proposed in the HTI-1 proposed rule. This On the Subject discusses the final ruleâs information blocking provisions, which are intended to support the sharing of electronic health information (EHI), but also include new and expanded exceptions to the information blocking prohibition applicable to health IT developers of certified health IT (certified health IT developers), health information network or health information exchanges (HIN/HIEs) and health care providers (collectively, actors). The HTI-1 final rule becomes effective 30 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. We will release separate publications discussing ONCâs changes to the certification criteria and standards. For more information about ONCâs final information blocking regulations adopted in 2020, see their Special Report. KEY CHANGES TO THE INFORMATION BLOCKING REGULATIONS
INFORMATION BLOCKING PROHIBITION Under the regulations adopted by ONC in 2020, information blocking means a practice that, except as required by law or covered by an exception adopted by ONC, is likely to interfere with access, exchange or use of EHI and meets one of the following criteria:
For an initial period (before October 6, 2022), the EHI within the definition of information blocking was limited to the data elements represented in the US Core Data for Interoperability version 1 standard. Since October 6, 2022, EHI for purposes of the information blocking definition has meant all protected health information to the extent it would be included in an electronic designated record set as such terms are defined by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The HTI-1 final rule did not change the current definition but did remove the now-obsolete language that applied prior to October 6, 2022. DEFINITIONS OF âCERTIFIED HEALTH IT DEVELOPERâ AND âOFFER HEALTH ITâ The certified health IT developer category of actors includes individuals or entities that âofferâ certified health IT, but do not themselves develop certified health IT or take responsibility for the certification of health IT under the Health IT Certification Program. The HTI-1 proposed rule included a proposed definition of âoffer health ITâ to clarify what arrangements would cause an individual or entity to become a certified health IT developer. The HTI-1 final rule adopts substantially the same definition as proposed but with wording changes intended to Improve clarity. As finalized, offer health IT means to hold out for sale, resale, license, or relicense or to sell, resell, license, relicense or otherwise provide or supply health IT that includes one or more certified health IT modules for deployment by or for other individuals or entities except for certain excluded arrangements. The excluded arrangements that would not constitute an offer are certain:
The exclusion for health IT donation and funding subsidy arrangements is potentially valuable for health systems and other health care providers that subsidize independent physician practicesâ and hospitalsâ purchase or license of certified EHRs under the Stark Lawâs EHR donation exception and the Anti-Kickback Statuteâs EHR donation safe harbor. However, ONC states in the preamble that the exclusion from the offer health IT definition would not apply when an actor licenses or otherwise provides a health IT item or service itself to a recipient. The scope of the definition (including its exclusions) is important for health systems and other health care delivery organizations that may operate as a health care provider category of actor in most cases, but potentially act as a certified health IT developer actor in other instances by offering health IT to third parties. The category of actor impacts the knowledge standard under the information definition and the potential liability for information blocking violations. If the subsidizing providers are deemed to be certified health IT developers as offerors, they can be held liable for civil monetary penalties for any information blocking under the Cures Act. For more information about the final rule implementing the Cures Act provisions authorizing the HHS Office of Inspector General to impose civil monetary penalties for information blocking violations, see their Special Report. If the subsidizing providers are instead health care provider actors, they can be held liable for appropriate disincentives after HHS finalizes its appropriate disincentives proposed rule. For more information about HHSâs appropriate disincentives proposed rule, see their On the Subject. EXPANSION OF THE INFEASIBILITY EXCEPTION The information blocking regulations include the infeasibility exception to allow an actorâs practice of denying a request to access, exchange or use EHI due to the infeasibility of the request, provided that both of the following apply:
The final rule amends the uncontrollable events condition in the infeasibility exception and adds two new conditions: one to allow an actor to deny a third party seeking modification use of EHI; and a second to allow an offer to deny a request for access, exchange or use after exhausting alternative manners offered under the manner exception. The final rule does not change the previously finalized conditions for segmentation and infeasibility under the circumstances. Uncontrollable Events Condition The uncontrollable events condition permits an actorâs practice of not fulfilling a request to access, exchange or use EHI that is infeasible for the actor to fulfill as a result of an event (e.g., a disaster or public health emergency) listed in the condition. The final rule revises the text of the condition to clarify that the mere fact that an uncontrollable event occurred is not sufficient for an actor to meet the condition. Instead, there must be a causal connection between the actorâs inability to fulfill a request and the uncontrollable event. Third Party Seeking a Modification Use Condition ONC finalized a new infeasibility condition that allows an actor to deny a request to provide the ability for a third party (or its application or other technology) to modify (e.g., create, write or delete) EHI maintained by or for a health care provider or other entity that has deployed health IT, provided that the request is not from a health care provider requesting such use from an actor that is its business associate (as defined by HIPAA). The final condition is the same as ONCâs proposed condition except for a non-substantive editorial change to shorten the text. The new condition addresses concerns by some certified health IT developers and other actors that there are not established standards for data modification use cases and that the modification of EHI by third parties may cause data integrity and security issues. Manner Exception Exhausted Condition ONC finalized a new manner exception exhausted condition under the infeasibility exception that permits an actor to deny a request for access, exchange or use of EHI after offering at least two alternative manners in accordance with the Content and Manner Exception (which ONC renamed the âManner Exceptionâ and to which ONC made technical amendments). According to the HTI-1 final rule preamble, ONC intends for the new condition to address some actorsâ concerns about requests that require an actor to divert substantial technical, human or financial resources toward ânew, unique or unusual manners of supporting access, exchange or use of EHIâ and away from scalable, consensus standards-based solutions. On the other hand, ONC appears less receptive to concerns of third-party application developers and software-enabled or data-enabled service providers that some actors unfairly make available nonstandard application programming interfaces (APIs) and other interoperability elements to preferred requestors while denying substantially the same interoperability element to requestors that have developed competitive products or are otherwise disfavored. To satisfy the new manner exception exhausted condition, the actor must be unable to fulfill a request based on the following three factors:
The manner exception exhausted condition also provides that in determining whether a requestor is similarly situated for purposes of the condition, an actor must not discriminate based on the following criteria:
The prohibition on delineating entities based on size and type contrasts with the fees and licensing exceptions frameworks, which would permit groupings of similarly situated customers based on size and type for purposes of administering costs and licensing terms. TEFCA EXCEPTION The HTI-1 final rule includes a new TEFCA manner exception that allows an actor to limit the manner in which it fulfills a request to access, exchange or use EHI to only via TEFCA. The final exception is a standalone exception instead of the proposed ruleâs proposed manner condition to the manner exception and includes some substantive changes in response to comments to the proposed rule. TEFCA originates from Section 4003 of the Cures Act, which required ONC to convene stakeholders to develop or support a national trusted exchange framework and common agreement for the exchange of health information between health information networks. Over the last several years, ONC has worked with stakeholders and its recognized coordinating entity, the Sequoia Project, to develop the Common Agreement for Nationwide Interoperability, the Qualified Health Information Network Technical Framework and other framework documents. Through its framework documents, TEFCA outlines a common set of principles, terms and conditions to enable nationwide exchange of EHI. On December 12, 2023, the first Qualified Health Information Networks (QHINs) were designated by The Sequoia Project on behalf of ONC, marking the start of information exchange via TEFCA. Under the TEFCA manner exception, an actorâs practice of limiting the manner in which it fulfills a request for access, exchange or use of EHI to only via TEFCA will not be considered information blocking when the practice meets the following conditions:
ACTION ITEMS The HTI-1 final rule will have a significant impact on the information sharing activities of a broad cross-section of the health care industry. Impacted organizations should consider taking the following steps in response to the final rule: All Actors (Health Care Providers, Certified Health IT Developers, HIN/HIEs)
Certified Health IT Developers and HIN/HIEs
Health Care Providers
[View source.] Piotr is the CEO of Infermedica, a leading AI health company dedicated to improving preliminary symptom analysis and digital triage. In the healthcare industry, they work for patients, so it isnât just a buzzword when they talk about "patient-centered" care. Care should always have been centered around the patient, but a lack of resources and workforce has made this ideal a struggle. Now, with the emergence of AI and large language models (LLMs), technology can help to truly put patients at the center of healthcare. In this article, Iâll outline how LLMs can Improve the patient experience before I address a few concerns about limitations and privacy. LLMs In The Service Of CareHere are a few ways that LLMs can assist the healthcare industry in centering care around patients' needs: Innovating Access To CareThe emergence of LLMs opens up a whole new world of possibilities about what particulars of healthcare patients can access, and how they can access it. With 88% of U.S. adults lacking sufficient healthcare literacy to navigate healthcare systems, LLMs can assist in areas of triage to guide patients to the right level of care at the right time. They can also be used to facilitate and simplify materials related to medical conditions, while speech-to-text (STT) and text-to-speech (TTS) features allow LLMs to hear us and talk backâa mode of communication that is so valuable for people with certain disabilities. Moreover, the ability of LLMs to provide fast and accurate language translations can also Improve accessibility. A Patient, Not A Number: Tailored Medical CareItâs been a long-term goal to stop treating patients as a number and start giving truly personalized care. But, until now, this has simply not been feasible due to financial constraints, physician shortages, overburdened systems and many other factors. With the emergence of LLMs, personalized healthcare is more within reach. LLMs can process and analyze vast amounts of patient data, such as genetic makeup, lifestyle, medical history, current medications and much more. Imagine if, for each patient, all of these factors were taken into account every time. LLMs can flag potential risks and suggest checkups or preventative care. They can also analyze data from patient demographics to benefit the wider community. They can help in the creation of tailored treatment plans for chronic conditions, which could then be approved by a medical professional. For example, a recent paper on hemodialysis highlights the effective use of generative AI in addressing the challenges nephrologists face in creating personalized patient treatment plans. Engagement Beyond The Consultation RoomPatients who are more engaged with their healthcare provider and decisions about their health tend to have better healthcare outcomes. This is because they often have higher engagement with preventative services, as well as better adherence to treatment processes. Improving access to medical care and tailoring that care to specific needs are two crucial factors in keeping patients engaged and empowering them to be more involved in decisions that affect their health. On top of that, simple procedures that are now either missing or time-consuming for providers can be automated (yet tailored) by LLMs. For example, appointment scheduling, reminders and follow-up communication can all be taken on by LLMs, not only removing the burden from providers but also assisting in the tailoring of the messages and communication that keeps the patient at the center. Maturity And Limitations Of LLMsWhile there are all these fantastic and illuminating opportunities, itâs imperative that they still keep the ultimate focus on providing accurate medical care that is secure and protects the privacy of its patients. To that end, they must acknowledge the limitations of LLMs in their current state and work to implement other safeguards that mitigate the risks associated with relying too heavily on AI: Limitations In Output AccuracyLLMs create their responses based on vast quantities of free text, so there is the potential for bias in their output. For example, if certain demographics are underrepresented or there's a preference towards particular treatments in the data, the LLM draws information from this, which can result in inaccuracies in providing the best medical responses. Furthermore, another concern is hallucinations, which are "outputs from an LLM that are contextually implausible, inconsistent with the real world and unfaithful to the input," according to a exact paper. Hallucinations can have serious consequences in healthcare if they provide an inaccurate diagnosis or recommend the wrong treatment plan. To this point, whether it's an LLM-based system or any other type of AI, they must ensure it undergoes rigorous testing and validation. One such method is to include medical professionals in the development of such tools and in the supervision of output. Privacy And SecurityRecognizing and addressing concerns related to data privacy and security is a must for all healthtech companies. To achieve this, developers need to be transparent about their use of such technologies and how they functionâand share the knowledge of potential risks openly. For example, some studies suggest that due to LLMs relying on "memorizing" vast quantities of data, there is a possibility that they could memorize personal informationâcreating the risk that this private data could then be recycled back into the training data and made public. Developers must now consider options to combat such risks and maintain compliance with regulators, such as HIPAA or GDPR. For example, anonymizing training data so that no person is identifiable through their personal data. Preventative measures also need to be taken to ensure that data is collected, stored and used correctly and with explicit consent. In addition, regular scrutiny and tests must be carried out to ensure the highest level of data privacy is being maintained, with strong encryption methods being vital to protect against external attacks. LLMsâReady For Health Care?Itâs exciting to visualize the improved patient experience that LLMs can offer. When applied with caution and integrity that protects patients from the current limitations, LLMs will transform patient care as they know it via personalization, opening up access and helping patients to become more engaged with their health. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify? Scott Thompson has been writing professionally since 1990, beginning with the "Pequawket Valley News." He is the author of nine published books on courses such as history, martial arts, poetry and fantasy fiction. His work has also appeared in "Talebones" magazine and the "Strange Pleasures" anthology. Shifts in the data storage market mean opportunities for smaller nimble startups to push the edge of technology and help discover new ways to store data, as exemplified in this list of 10 storage startups for 2023. Storage Startups: Looking Beyond The Horizon Where customers may be turning away from legacy storage technologies to the cloud or to hybrid on-premises and cloud infrastructures, the opportunity arises for startups to demonstrate new ways to do it. It might be new hardware or software that ties cloud and on-premises storage, or new technologies to better monitor and manage capacities, or more commonly, new ways to protect data against ransomware. And customers appear to be looking over the horizon at new ways to handle storage. They may need to Improve how they manage object storage, which was growing fast but is now growing uncontrollably thanks to the AI and GenAI wave. They need new ways to protect data in general or on particular clouds, particularly in the face of unrelentless ransomware attacks. They need to Improve the performance of on-premises data. They need ways to make mainframe applications easily access cloud-based data and vice versa. [Related: The 10 Hottest Data Storage Startups Of 2022] All these technologies are available today, thanks in part to the continuing influx of new ideas and new money into the storage business. CRN takes a look at 10 startups looking to bring new storage capabilities to market and in the process stake their claim to a bigger part of the business going forward. BackupLabs CEO and Co-founder: Rob Stevenson Headquarters: London Website: https://backuplabs.io/ BackupLabs, which came out of stealth mode in January 2023, develops secure automated backup technology specifically for SaaS cloud applications including Trello, GitHub, GitLab, Notion, Jira, and more. The company has a strong SMB pedigree, being founded by the team behind SMB data backup developer BackupVault. BackupLabs protects SaaS platform data with automated daily backups, rapid restores with granular recovery, protection against accidental or malicious deletion, 256-bit AES encryption, audit logs, and compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and more. Impossible Cloud CEO and Co-founder: Kai Wawrzinek Headquarters: Hamburg, Germany Website: https://www.impossiblecloud.com/ Impossible Cloud provides a decentralized, enterprise-grade cloud for Kubernetes-friendly and AWS S3-compatible object storage with built-in data resilience and immutability and no single point of failure. It claims it can do so in a way to save customers up to 75 percent of the cost of other providers. Impossible Cloud Storage targets storage for big data, backup, and archive use cases, and integrates with other cloud storage technologies as Veeam, MSP360, and AWS. The company in September was also certified to work with Veritas Backup Exec, and is now a Veritas elite partner. This Summer also saw Impossible Cloud launch its first partner program. Impossible Cloud in March unveiled a seed funding round 7 million euros or about $7.6 million, bringing total funding to date to 10 million euros or about $10.9 million. Iodyne Co-Presidents: Mike Shapiro and Jeff Bonwick Headquarters: Mill Valley, Calif. Website: https://iodyne.com/ Iodyne manufactures the Pro Data line of all-NVMe SSD-based Thunderbolt RAID systems. The Pro Data combines multiple SSDs and multiple Thunderbolt port pairs in a single package that stores up to 48 TBytes of capacity and includes RAID-6 and XTS-AES-256 encryption protection. The devices are portable, making their capacity available where necessary. Up to six Pro Data devices can be daisy-chained to each Thunderbolt port pair, and multiple daisy chains can be connected to computers with multiple Thunderbolt host ports. Leil Storage CEO and Co-founder: Aleksandr Ragel Headquarters: Tallinn, Estonia Website: https://leil.io/ Leil Storage in March, 2023 launched its scalable data backup and archiving technologies based on purpose-built hardware and its own SaunaFS distributed file system. The company does that via a close relationship with strategic partner Western Digital. Leil Storage has partnered with Western Digital to take advantage of the latterâs host-managed shingled magnetic recording, or HM-SMR, hard drives and its Power Disable HDD management technology, which Leil Storage said helps reduce per-terabyte energy consumption by 18 percent over other technologies while improving performance over existing storage systems. It plans to introduce a power disable feature to decrease storage power draw by 25 percent. Nimesa CEO and Co-founder: Tapesh Goyal Headquarters: San Jose, Calif. Website: https://nimesa.io/ Nimesa is a developer of data protection and copy data management technology aimed at enterprise users of AWS EC2 instances, RDS, load balancers, S3, and more. It is available as an AMI (Amazon machine image) that can be securely run as an EC2 instance to help transform various data center operations and reduce OpEx for use cases such as backup and recovery, TestDev, analytics, application rollouts, disaster recover, and more. It provides policy-based backup, instant restore, and cloning of EC2 instances. Cloud admins can use it to create fast, space-efficient, point-in-time copies of EBS volumes and EC2 instances for use in backups and AWS disaster recovery strategies, or as a way to use production data in various secondary use cases. Nodeum CEO and Co-founder: ValĂ©ry Guilleaume Headquarters: Liege, Belgium Website: https://www.nodeum.io/ Nodeum builds a services-oriented storage system designed with scalability and redundancy which indexes all metadata files into a single catalog to allow users to easily search and move data. It provides data discovery, copy, migration, control, and deletion via its policy-based automation engine. Nodeumâs plugin connectors provide hybrid storage management across NAS, cloud, and tape storage, while its virtual file system allows access to any type of secondary storage. Object First CEO: David Bennett Headquarters: Boston Website: https://objectfirst.com/ Object First, a startup developer of purpose-built data protection appliances, in June 2022 exited stealth with $12.5 million in investment and a simple focus on providing a high-performance tier of protection for data managed by Veeam. The tie to Veeam is no accident given that the co-founders of Object First, Ratmir Timashev and Andrei Baronov, were also co-founders of Veeam, and continued to support Veeam after it was acquired in early 2020 by Insight Partners. Object First developed a turnkey hardware appliance it calls Ootbi, short for out-of-the-box immutability. Ootbi is based on the companyâs proprietary software designed to reside in an end customerâs on-premises environment and provide immutable storage tied specifically to Veeam environments. VirtualZ CEO and Co-founder: Jeanne Glass Headquarters: Minneapolis Website: https://virtualzcomputing.com/ Storage startup VirtualZ in December exited stealth mode with technology that moves data between IBM Z mainframe servers and cloud or on-premises applications and vice versa. Itâs $2.2 million seed funding round gives the company a total funding of $4.9 million. VirtualZ tackles issues around the fact that data on mainframes and distributed systems is incompatible, and custom coding is typically needed to bridge the two, with three applications that eliminates that need. These include Lozen, which provides real-time read and write access to mainframe-based data by cloud, SaaS, distributed, and custom applications; Zaac, which allows data in hybrid cloud, physical storage and SaaS systems to be accessed by mainframe-based applications in real-time; and PropelZ, a utility for quickly creating a copy of mainframe data as needed for experimentation or analysis in hybrid cloud environments. Volumez CEO: Amir Faintuch Headquarters: Santa Clara, Calif. Website: https://volumez.com/ Volumez develops composable infrastructure software to help developers request storage resources instead of relying on conventional on-premises or cloud storage. Its controller orchestration software uses Linux to execute modern data infrastructure workloads using a declarative interface aimed at deploying a wide variety of applications in hybrid and multi-cloud environments. The result is a controller-less architecture that composes direct Linux data paths between media and applications to help solve latency and scalability issues and unlock high performance and high resiliency of data large-scale data analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning applications. Volumez in April 2023 unveiled a series A funding round that brought the company $20 million, and in November joined both the Azure and AWS marketplaces. Weebit Nano CEO: Coby Hanoch Headquarters: Hod Hasharon, Israel Website: https://www.weebit-nano.com/ Weebit Nano develops an advanced semiconductor memory technology, Resistive RAM (ReRAM), targeting the growing need for significantly higher performance and lower power memory solutions in a range of new electronic products such as Internet of Things (IoT) devices, smartphones, robotics, autonomous vehicles, 5G communications, and artificial intelligence. ReRAM helps reduce the cost of semiconductor memory while increasing performance and energy efficiency when compared to existing flash memory technologies, the company said. Weebit Nano works with GlobalFoundries as its wafer manufacturer using that companyâs 22nm process. Weebit Nano in April 2023 closed a $40 million funding round. Today, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR), announced a settlement with Lafourche Medical Group, a Louisiana medical group specializing in emergency medicine, occupational medicine, and laboratory testing. The settlement resolves an investigation following a phishing attack that affected the electronic protected health information of approximately 34,862 individuals. Phishing is a type of cybersecurity attack used to trick individuals into disclosing sensitive information via electronic communication, such as email, by impersonating a trustworthy source. This marks the first settlement OCR has resolved involving a phishing attack under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Rules. HIPAA is the federal law that protects the privacy and security of health information. âPhishing is the most common way that hackers gain access to health care systems to steal sensitive data and health information,â said OCR Director Melanie Fontes Rainer. âIt is imperative that the health care industry be vigilant in protecting its systems and sensitive medical records, which includes regular training of staff and consistently monitoring and managing system risk to prevent these attacks. They all have a role to play in keeping their health care system safe and taking preventive steps against phishing attacks.â On May 28, 2021, Lafourche Medical Group filed a breach report with HHS stating that a hacker, through a successful phishing attack on March 30, 2021, gained access to an email account that contained electronic protected health information. When protected health information is compromised by a cyber-attack breach such as phishing, incredibly sensitive information about an individualâs medical records is at risk. The types of sensitive information can include medical diagnoses, frequency of visits to a therapist or other health care professionals, and where an individual seeks medical treatment. Phishing attacks can result in identity theft, financial loss, discrimination, stigma, mental anguish, negative consequences to the reputation, health, or physical safety of the individual or to others identified in the individualâs protected health information. Health care providers, health plans and data clearinghouses regulated by HIPAA are required to file breach reports with HHS. Based on the large breaches reported to OCR this year, over 89 million individuals have been affected by large breaches. In 2022, over 55 million individuals were affected. OCRâs investigation revealed that, prior to the 2021 reported breach, Lafourche Medical Group failed to conduct a risk analysis to identify potential threats or vulnerabilities to electronic protected health information across the organization as required by HIPAA. OCR also discovered that Lafourche Medical Group had no policies or procedures in place to regularly review information system activity to safeguard protected health information against cyberattacks. As a result, Lafourche Medical Group agreed to pay $480,000 to OCR and to implement a corrective action plan that will be monitored by OCR for two years. Lafourche Medical Group will take the following steps to resolve and comply with:
OCR is committed to enforcing the HIPAA Rules that protect the privacy and security of protected health information. Guidance about the Privacy Rule, Security Rule, and Breach Notification Rules can be found on OCRâs website. Additional cybersecurity resources may be found at: The resolution agreement and corrective action plan may be found at: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/agreements/lafourche-medical-group/index.html The HHS Breach Portal: Notice to the Secretary of HHS Breach of Unsecured Protected Health Information may be found at: https://ocrportal.hhs.gov/ocr/breach/breach_report.jsf. If you believe that your or another personâs health information privacy or civil rights have been violated, you can file a complaint with OCR at https://www.hhs.gov/ocr/complaints/index.html. With cybersecurity incidents occurring on an almost-daily basis in the healthcare sector, federal regulators are looking to take a more active role in improving data security. The Health and Human Services Department has released a new strategy for cybersecurity, centered on four steps aimed at improving the healthcare landscape. The six-page document builds off of the Biden administrationâs National Cybersecurity Strategy, which was unveiled last March, and follows exact actions taken by federal agencies to boost security, including the release of healthcare-specific practices and training resources, guidance on medical device security from the US Food and Drug Administration, and new telehealth guidelines from the HHS Office of Civil Rights (OCR). âThe healthcare sector is particularly vulnerable, and the stakes are especially high,â HHS Secretary Javier Becerra said in a release accompanying the strategy. âOur commitment to this work reflects that urgency and importance. HHS is working with healthcare and public health partners to bolster their cyber security capabilities nationwide.â The information comes at a particularly vulnerable time for the healthcare industry, which has seen an alarming increase in large data breaches and ransomware attacks in exact months. According to the OCR, the industry has seen an almost two-fold increase in large breaches from 2018 to 2022, from 369 incidents to 712, while ransomware attacks have surged 278% in that time. âCyber incidents affecting hospitals and health systems have led to extended care disruptions caused by multi-week outages; patient diversion to other facilities; and strain on acute care provisioning and capacity, causing cancelled medical appointments, non-rendered services, and delayed medical procedures (particularly elective procedures),â the HHS report notes. âMore importantly, they put patientsâ safety at risk and impact local and surrounding communities that depend on the availability of the local emergency department, radiology unit, or cancer center for life-saving care.â With that in mind, HHS is planning to take a more active role in pushing the healthcare industry to Improve its defenses. The agency plans to:
Of particular note are the financial incentives that the government will be offering to health systems who need help becoming more secure. According to the report, the HHS will be launching a program to help struggling hospitals cover the up-front costs of installing âessentialâ cybersecurity performance goals (CPGs), and a program that offers incentives for hospitals to invest in advanced cybersecurity practices to implement âadvancedâ CPGs. In addition, the HHS strategy will include new cybersecurity requirements for hospitals that will be enforced through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an indication that the feds could tie compliance to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements. As well, the OCR is scheduled to update the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) Security Rule this coming spring to include cybersecurity requirements. Not everyone is on board with the HHS strategy. Chris Bowen, founder and chief information security officer for ClearDATA, says the industry should get even tougher. âWhile a gesture towards progress, [the strategy] falls critically short of what's imperative in today's climate,â he said in an e-mail to HealthLeaders. âSuggesting voluntary measures is akin to applying a band-aid on a hemorrhage, it's time for HHS to enforce rigorous, non-negotiable cybersecurity standards and to provide the necessary resources and mandates.â âThe sector's talent gap in cybersecurity is no secret, and it places their hospitals at a disadvantage, jeopardizing patient safety,â he adds. âWe must look to the strategies of those who have robustly safeguarded healthcare data and replicate their assertive approach. Protecting lives extends beyond the physical realm; it encompasses shielding patients from the lethal threat of cyber-attacks. To accept minimum, voluntary standards is to tacitly endorse a status quo that endangers their patients.â Eric Wicklund is the associate content manager and senior editor for Innovation, Technology, Telehealth, Supply Chain and Pharma for HealthLeaders. | ||||||||
HIO-301 study | HIO-301 study | HIO-301 information search | HIO-301 learner | HIO-301 availability | HIO-301 approach | HIO-301 thinking | HIO-301 mission | HIO-301 mission | HIO-301 action | | ||||||||
Killexams exam Simulator Killexams Questions and Answers Killexams Exams List Search Exams |
Customer Reviews help to evaluate the exam performance in real test. Here all the reviews, reputation, success stories and ripoff reports provided.
We hereby announce with the collaboration of world's leader in Certification Exam Dumps and Real Exam Questions with Practice Tests that, we offer Real Exam Questions of thousands of Certification Exams Free PDF with up to date VCE exam simulator Software.