HP Designing and Implementing HP

Randomised reviews of fitness programmes: from design to implementation | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

This information is for the 2018/19 session.

Dr Mylene Lagarde COW 3.02

This route is accessible on the MSc in global health policy, MSc in fitness policy, Planning and Financing, MSc in international health coverage and MSc in international fitness policy (health Economics). This path is accessible with permission as an out of doors alternative to college students on other programmes the place regulations enable.

Randomized trials have long been used in the scientific world to test the efficacy of scientific cures. these days, social scientists have began the usage of the identical strategy, the usage of random assignment to allocate materials or put in force a policy intervention in a different way to distinctive businesses, so as to assess the causal effects of the policy of interest. The recognition of randomized opinions has grown above all, however now not exclusively, among researchers and policymakers in low- and center-salary settings.

Conducting a successful randomized contrast contains many inter-connected steps and a great realizing of a number of statistical ideas. Randomized opinions additionally usually require to design and organise the data assortment of important and effective advice, which includes a number of crucial steps to evade pitfalls.  it is hence elementary to take note these diverse steps to design and put into effect randomised opinions accurately, or to be in a position to severely analyse them.

This path proposes a fingers-on and intuitive strategy to designing and conducting a randomised comparison. in the first half of the direction, we are able to talk about causes for engaging in randomised critiques; how to design the randomise scan to be certain it solutions the query(s) of activity (together with issues of statistical energy and pattern size calculation); a way to contend with threats to randomisation. in the second half of the course, we can focus on practical considerations raised with the aid of fundamental facts collection, including a way to highest quality measure consequences of hobby; the way to design good equipment and the way to behavior and manipulate fieldwork.

Seminars can be designed to motivate college students to significantly have interaction with the subject matters and follow the technical advantage taught. each and every seminar should be closely aligned with the lecture content material to supply college students the chance to observe the brand new capabilities. Case reviews might be chosen from a variety of cultural backgrounds, to allow the presentation of a diverse latitude of settings and considerations.

15 hours of lectures and 15 hours of seminars within the LT.

A draft protocol. college students could be asked to post a brief 1,500 be aware draft protocol by way of week eight. while some elements of their work may additionally still be work in progress (e.g. the use of bullet facets), college students might be expected to write up the first half of their protocol in a more particular way. The outlines may be graded and comments given to students. This permits college students to get helpful event of writing at MSc level at LSE, and they'll also take note greater chiefly the expectations of the summative evaluation. students may be able to use this remarks of their writing of the summative work.

research concept (a hundred%) within the LT.

The goal of the analysis protocol (4,000 words max) will be to plan the randomised assessment of a selected health programme. students may be requested to decide on one programme from a proposed list. they will even be given the choice to select their own intervention (pending contract by their seminar leader).

HP's next-gen windows combined truth headset will activity a brand new design and excessive-res shows | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Microsoft showed off the primary client home windows mixed truth head-hooked up shows (HMDs) from partners equivalent to Acer, Dell, HP, and Lenovo back in October 2017 at an adventure in San Francisco. The contraptions launched alongside the windows 10 Fall Creators replace, with expenditures beginning at $299. The HMDs got here with distinctive designs, however an identical requirements corresponding to a 1440X1440 decision reveal, and framerates of 60fps for PCs with integrated snap shots and 90fps for programs with discrete pix.

whereas no longer a whole lot in the means of a refresh to a lot of these devices took place, Samsung launched its 2d-generation HMD, the Odyssey+ in October 2018, with advancements to necessities and the design of the device. soon, an additional new headset may well be on the manner, as HP is additionally readying it next-era HMD, as per the folks at RoadtoVR who bought an unique preview of the unannounced home windows blended fact headset, codenamed ‘Copper’.

The record states that HP is re-designing its HMD from the floor up, and from the looks of it, it does seem like a significant replace. The gadget now sports an Oculus Rift-like design with the top straps going in the course of the sides and above the head, assembly at a circular structure on the again. The device is also expected to come with a heathered fabric on the front where the cameras for monitoring can be found. The headset is declared to be lighter, making it more at ease to wear, and it'll additionally feature greater mechanicals to make it simpler to put on and take away.

As for specs, the next-era device will offer a 2160X2160 resolution screen per eye, making it probably the most pixel-dense monitor in a mixed reality Headset yet. In evaluation, Samsung’s new Odyssey+ sports a 1440X1600 decision monitor per eye. surely, the denser display makes for crisp, clear photographs, bringing a good deal-mandatory advancements to the journey. The denser screen also helps masks the reveal door effect (the impact brought about by way of the unlit spaces between any two pixels), negating the want for extra add-ons like the diffuser on Samsung’s Odyssey+.

HP states that the improvements to the HMD got here from its commercial enterprise clients and that the clients didn’t trust the box of view a big enviornment of challenge as tons as the decision and comfort. The firm is planning on bringing this headset to its machine as a carrier for VR offering as part of the Z by way of HP brand.

while HP didn't exhibit details about the launch date or pricing, the business did ascertain that it might be selling the machine to both, agencies and consumers. windows combined truth has been receiving advancements within the newest examine builds for the next important windows 10 replace, which may pretty much certainly be referred to as the home windows 10 April 2019 update. The platform has additionally begun seeing expanded relevance in gaming, so it will be enjoyable to look how neatly ‘Copper’ could be obtained, and if the improvements inspire extra users to accept as true with it.

supply: RoadtoVR by the use of Thurrott

Autodesk develops generative design software for HP and GE Additive 3D printers | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Autodesk, an award-successful American utility business, has collaborated with HP and GE Additive to increase generative design application tools that work at once with 3D printers.

according to Autodesk’s Netfabb and Fusion 360, the design-to-print workflow for additive manufacturing might be integrated in HP Multi Jet Fusion and GE Direct metal Laser Melting (DMLM) programs to boost rapid prototyping for production-capable 3D printed parts.

Robert Yancey, director of producing trade approach at Autodesk, defined to Design news:

“To unencumber the total value of HP MJF printers, you want a good design, a superb fabric, and a pretty good print technique. Autodesk develops the design tools and know-how, HP develops the print method, and HP with their material partners develops the materials. All features are required to achieve highest efficiency.”

A generative workflow

throughout Formnext, HP announced a partnership with Autodesk to permit generative design capabilities throughout the whole HP Multi Jet Fusion portfolio. Following this collaboration, Christoph Schell, President of 3D Printing and Digital Manufacturing, HP Inc., pointed out:

“Many industries akin to automobile, which goes via its greatest transformation in more than one hundred years, wish to new technologies and strategic companions like HP to support them enhanced compete in this time of alternate.”

“we're working with innovators to exchange the way they design and manufacture, unlocking new purposes, more manufacturing flexibility, and stronger innovation, effectivity, and sustainability throughout their product development lifecycle.”

in a similar fashion, Autodesk is working with GE Additive to streamline steel additive manufacturing. using GE Additive’s utility algorithms, interfaces, and specialized information fashions, this workflow will offer predictive insights for cost and timeline projections within the early degrees of design.

“Working with Autodesk will give a powerful design-to-print atmosphere for our consumers, helping lower the barriers of additive adoption while accelerating a customer’s time to first decent half,” stated Lars Bruns, government software leader at GE Additive.

enforcing an conclusion-to-conclusion workflow

As a mutual customer of Autodesk and HP, Penumbra Engineering, a u.s.generative design company, currently used Autodesk’s design-to-print workflow to provide an ultrasonic sensing device. This 3D printed half changed into designed to be light-weight and durable inside excessive environments.

“The Penumbra case look at uncovers the value of HP working with Autodesk generative design expertise,” brought Yancey.

“We’re aiding HP printers in Fusion 360 and Netfabb in order that HP multi-jet fusion valued clientele have the design and print prep tools they need. We’re working with HP to give support for the brand new metallic printers.”

put up your nominations now for the 3D Printing business Awards 2019.

also, for the newest 3D Printing trade updates subscribe to our newsletter, observe us on Twitter and like us on facebook.

looking for a clean birth within the new year? discuss with 3D Printing Jobs to commence your career in additive manufacturing.

Featured image suggests 3D printed materials from HP. image by means of HP.

While it is hard errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater part of other's sham report objection customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. We never bargain on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Extraordinarily we deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by our rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something like this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a great many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams rehearse questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our example questions and test brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-2]

925-201b VCE | HP2-H30 study guide | C2170-051 dumps questions | LCAC questions and answers | HP2-T26 brain dumps | DC0-261 questions answers | HP2-N26 test prep | 132-S-916.2 examcollection | HP0-065 real questions | JN0-531 practice test | MSC-321 test questions | C2010-023 real questions | 000-113 bootcamp | 000-210 real questions | EE0-411 free pdf | C2010-502 cheat sheets | 920-530 practice test | JN0-410 sample test | 1Z0-597 test prep | 000-586 braindumps |

Murder your HP0-J36 exam at first attempt!
killexams.com provide latest and updated Practice Test with Actual test Questions and Answers for new syllabus of HP HP0-J36 Exam. Practice our Real Questions and braindumps to Improve your knowledge and pass your exam with High Marks. We ensure your success in the Test Center, covering all the topics of exam and build your Knowledge of the HP0-J36 exam. Pass 4 sure with our accurate questions. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are provided at http://killexams.com/cart

If you are trying to seek out killexams.com HP HP0-J36 Dumps containing actual exams Questions and Answers for the Designing and Implementing HP LeftHand SAN test instruction, we offer most updated and quality database of HP0-J36 Dumps this is often http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/HP0-J36. we have aggregated an information of HP0-J36 Dumps questions from real tests with a particular purpose to make you prepare and pass HP0-J36 exam at the first attempt. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as below; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all tests on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders over $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

killexams.com enables a large number of candidates to pass the exams and get their certifications. We have countless studies. Our dumps are strong, sensible, updated and of genuinely best quality to vanquish the inconveniences of any IT certifications. killexams.com exam dumps are latest updated in exceedingly defeat path on standard introduce and material is released irregularly. Latest killexams.com dumps are open in testing centers with whom we are keeping up our relationship to get latest material.

The killexams.com exam questions for HP0-J36 Designing and Implementing HP LeftHand SAN exam is fundamentally in perspective of two accessible plans, PDF and Practice test. PDF record passes on all the exam questions, answers which makes your arranging less persevering. While the Practice test are the complimentary component in the exam thing. Which serves to self-study your progress. The appraisal device also includes your weak districts, where you need to put more attempt with the objective that you can improve each one of your stresses.

killexams.com recommend you to must attempt its free demo, you will see the normal UI and besides you will believe that its easy to change the prep mode. Regardless, guarantee that, the real HP0-J36 exam has a bigger number of questions than the example exam. In case, you are pacified with its demo then you can purchase the real HP0-J36 exam thing. killexams.com offers you three months free updates of HP0-J36 Designing and Implementing HP LeftHand SAN exam questions. Our certification group is continually available at back end who updates the material as and when required.

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-4]

Killexams 77-604 practice exam | Killexams HP0-P21 brain dumps | Killexams HP2-T29 pdf download | Killexams 9A0-279 questions answers | Killexams 000-569 free pdf download | Killexams 70-331 test prep | Killexams AEPA practice questions | Killexams 102-350 test questions | Killexams HP2-Q01 practice test | Killexams M2140-726 bootcamp | Killexams 642-242 braindumps | Killexams HP0-768 free pdf | Killexams 250-722 braindumps | Killexams HP2-H01 cram | Killexams 9A0-084 VCE | Killexams 000-068 dumps | Killexams 000-315 examcollection | Killexams 000-M79 real questions | Killexams E20-357 Practice test | Killexams MB2-718 cheat sheets |

[OPTIONAL-CONTENTS-5]

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps

Killexams 190-823 questions and answers | Killexams 2V0-621 braindumps | Killexams 000-870 braindumps | Killexams 650-304 questions and answers | Killexams 000-152 practice questions | Killexams 70-543-VB questions answers | Killexams 000-234 mock exam | Killexams C2090-310 free pdf | Killexams HP2-B109 dumps questions | Killexams 000-296 practice test | Killexams 190-950 free pdf download | Killexams CSET test prep | Killexams HP0-M77 real questions | Killexams JK0-801 cram | Killexams 6104 practice test | Killexams 1Z0-964 study guide | Killexams 600-460 study guide | Killexams HP2-K01 brain dumps | Killexams TEAS-N free pdf | Killexams ST0-095 study guide |

Designing and Implementing HP LeftHand SAN

HP Unveils New 3D Printing Global Reseller Program, Service Bureau ... | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

New customers and partners accelerate global reach and adoption of HP's commercial 3D printing solutions to reinvent manufacturing

PITTSBURGH, PA--(Marketwired - May 8, 2017) -  HP Inc. (NYSE: HPQ)

News highlights:

Today at Rapid + TCT, the industry's largest 3D additive manufacturing conference, HP Inc. demonstrated the global momentum of its Jet Fusion 3D Printing solutions as it scales its business to meet rising customer demand. This includes the official unveiling of the new HP Partner First 3D Printing Specialization program, a wide array of installations with manufacturing service bureaus and product design firms in key geographies, and more than a dozen new HP 3D Printing Reference and Experience Centers across the U.S. and Europe.

HP also announced the addition of Henkel AG & Co. to its open ecosystem for 3D printing materials and applications. HP's Jet Fusion 3D Printing solution is a production-ready commercial 3D printing system that delivers superior1 quality physical parts up to 10 times2 faster and at half the cost3 of current 3D print systems. 

"Building on our experience of more than 500,000 Multi Jet Fusion-produced parts, we are now scaling our 3D printing business to the next level. Today we are expanding our solutions availability through new resellers and service bureau partners, opening new experiential facilities for customers and partners, and widening our open 3D printing materials ecosystem," said Stephen Nigro, President of 3D Printing, HP Inc. "We are honored that industry-leading companies such as BMW, Jabil, Johnson & Johnson, Nike and dozens more are looking to the innovations and economics delivered by HP and our partners to help reinvent their businesses for the digital manufacturing revolution."

New HP 3D Printing Reseller Program To meet growing international customer demand, HP formally unveiled its new global reseller program -- the HP Partner First 3D Printing Specialization program -- with more than 30 hand-selected, trained and certified partners. Initially focused on North America and Europe, the program enables leading manufacturing solutions providers to rapidly deliver HP's 3D printing technologies to customers and scale up to meet their needs. Certified HP 3D printing reseller partners will bring best-in-class expertise and knowledge of HP's Multi Jet Fusion technology to customers deploying the solutions, as well as value added services such as the enablement of new applications and industry-leading response time and service quality.

Partners interested in more information about joining HP's Partner First 3D Printing Specialization program can connect with a local HP team member at https://partner.hp.com/.

Service Bureaus and Product Design Houses Showcase New HP Jet Fusion-powered 3D Printing Offerings Service bureaus and product design firms are a hallmark of manufacturing innovation, adopting leading-edge technologies ahead of the industry and delivering breakthrough services to their own end-customers. Leaders such as Fast Radius, Forecast3D, Go Proto, Materialise, ProtoCAM, Proto Labs, Shapeways, Sigma Design and 3D Prod are installing HP 3D printing systems and beginning to deliver production quality HP Jet Fusion 3D printed parts. 

Building on these successful installations, HP is expanding deployments with leading manufacturing service bureaus and design engineering firms across North America and Europe to enable a new class of on-demand, industrial-grade 3D production parts and services. 

To connect with an HP Jet Fusion-enabled 3D printing service bureau near you visit www.hp.com/go/3Dcontactus

HP Opens New 3D Printing Reference and Experience Centers HP, in collaboration with numerous partners, is opening more than a dozen 3D Printing Reference and Experience Centers across North America and Europe to enable companies to engage with HP's Jet Fusion 3D Printing solutions in production-level scenarios. Testing and qualification of new 3D printing use-cases will be enabled in controlled environments, providing customers a simpler path to advance from prototyping to full scale 3D production.

These centers initially include facilities in Allentown, PA; Alpharetta, GA; Carlsbad, CA; Corvallis, OR; Livonia, MI; Louisville, KY; Manchester, CT; Milpitas, CA; Palo Alto, CA; San Diego, CA; and Vancouver, WA in the United States; and Raon-l'Etape, France; Leonberg, Germany; Eindoven, The Netherlands; Barcelona, Spain; and Birmingham, United Kingdom.

For more information or to schedule a visit to an HP 3D Printing Reference and Experience Center please contact www.hp.com/go/3Dcontactus

Henkel Joins HP's Open Materials and Applications Platform Henkel joins HP's ecosystem of global materials leaders including Arkema, BASF, Evonik, and Lehmann & Voss, to support HP's Open Platform for 3D printing materials and applications. HP's unique open 3D printing platform model helps expand the availability of new materials and address a broader set of applications, lower materials and development costs, drive speed and performance improvements, and create new possibilities for part properties that address specific industry needs.

Henkel, a global supplier of high-performance adhesives used in critical applications such as medical device, electronic device, and transportation vehicle assembly, plans to work with HP in its state-of-art Open Materials and Applications Lab in Corvallis, Oregon to expand its broad product range. Henkel is focusing development on providing novel powder materials for use with HP Jet Fusion 3D printers.

"The partnership between HP and Henkel is backed by strong market leadership, a legacy of innovation, and an aligned commitment to additive manufacturing," said Michael Todd, Corporate Vice President and Global Head of Innovation and New Business Development, Henkel Adhesive Technologies. "With our broad material portfolio and customer base across diverse industries, Henkel is able to champion custom 3D solutions through various functional applications. This, combined with HP's vision for open materials innovation, enables us to develop materials and applications once thought impossible."

Learn more about becoming a certified HP Open Materials and Applications Platform partner.

HP at RAPID + TCT

About HP HP Inc. creates technology that makes life better for everyone, everywhere. Through our portfolio of printers, PCs, mobile devices, solutions and services, we engineer experiences that amaze. More information about HP Inc. is available at http://www.hp.com.

Forward-Looking Statements This news release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If the risks or uncertainties ever materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, the results of HP Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries ("HP") may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions.

All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including but not limited to any projections of net revenue, margins, expenses, effective tax rates, net earnings, net earnings per share, cash flows, benefit plan funding, deferred tax assets, share repurchases, currency exchange rates or other financial items; any projections of the amount, timing or impact of cost savings or restructuring and other charges; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, including the execution of restructuring plans and any resulting cost savings, revenue or profitability improvements; any statements concerning the expected development, performance, market share or competitive performance relating to products or services; any statements regarding current or future macroeconomic trends or events and the impact of those trends and events on HP and its financial performance; any statements regarding pending investigations, claims or disputes; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Risks, uncertainties and assumptions include the need to address the many challenges facing HP's businesses; the competitive pressures faced by HP's businesses; risks associated with executing HP's strategy; the impact of macroeconomic and geopolitical trends and events; the need to manage third-party suppliers and the distribution of HP's products and the delivery of HP's services effectively; the protection of HP's intellectual property assets, including intellectual property licensed from third parties; risks associated with HP's international operations; the development and transition of new products and services and the enhancement of existing products and services to meet customer needs and respond to emerging technological trends; the execution and performance of contracts by HP and its suppliers, customers, clients and partners; the hiring and retention of key employees; integration and other risks associated with business combination and investment transactions; the results of the restructuring plans, including estimates and assumptions related to the cost (including any possible disruption of HP's business) and the anticipated benefits of the restructuring plans; the resolution of pending investigations, claims and disputes; and other risks that are described in HP's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, HP's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended January 31, 2016, April 30, 2016 and July 31, 2016, and HP's other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements. HP's Investor Relations website at http://www.hp.com/investor/home contains a significant amount of information about HP, including financial and other information for investors. HP encourages investors to visit its website from time to time, as information is updated and new information is posted.

1 Based on dimensional accuracy of ±0.2 mm/0.008 inches, measured after sand blasting. See hp.com/go/3Dmaterials for more info on materials specifications. Based on the following mechanical properties: Tensile strength at 50, Modulus Z 1900, Modulus XY 1900. ASTM standard tests with PA-12 material.

2 Based on internal testing and simulation, HP Jet Fusion 3D printing solution average printing time is up to 10x faster than FDM & SLS printer solutions from $100,000 USD to $300,000 USD on market as of April 2016. Testing variables: Part Quantity -1 full bucket of parts from HP Jet Fusion 3D at 20% of packing density vs same number of parts on above-mentioned competitive devices; Part size: 30g; Layer thickness: 0.1mm/0.004 inches. Fast Cooling is enabled by HP Jet Fusion 3D Processing Station with Fast Cooling, available in 2017. HP Jet Fusion 3D Processing Station with Fast Cooling accelerates parts cooling time vs recommended manufacturer time of SLS printer solutions from $100,000 USD to $300,000 USD, as tested in April 2016. FDM not applicable.

3 Based on internal testing and public data, HP Jet Fusion 3D printing solution average printing cost-per-part is half the cost of comparable FDM & SLS printer solutions from $100,000 USD to $300,000 USD on market as of April 2016. Cost analysis based on: standard solution configuration price, supplies price, and maintenance costs recommended by manufacturer. Cost criteria: printing 1-2 buckets per day/ 5 days per week over 1 year of 30 grams parts at 10% packing density using the powder reusability ratio recommended by manufacturer.

SAP System Landscape Design and Planning Approaches | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Remember, a system landscape exists for each mySAP solution—if you deploy R/3, APO, CRM, and PLM, you will in effect be creating four different SAP system landscapes, one for each product. The focus in this and the following few sections, though, is on what one of these system landscapes looks like from a design and planning perspective, for example R/3 alone or APO alone.

In the most general form, an SAP system landscape consists of SAP instances (installations of the SAP database and application software) and SAP servers. In the Microsoft world of SAP implementations, there is a one-to-one correlation between instances and servers nearly all the time. That is, the Development instance resides on a dedicated Development server, the Test instance resides on a dedicated Test server, and so on. In the world of UNIX implementations, though, multiple instances can be often found on a single "larger" server. For example, both Development and Test instances can reside on a single server. And multiple application instances can be installed on a single server as well.

Until last year's release of SAP's Multiple Components, One Database (MCOD) initiative, there was a one-to-one correlation between instances and database systems, too, regardless of the Operating System platform. MCOD is beginning to change this, such that a single "larger" database can be leveraged for multiple instances. However, an important difference between MCOD and multiple instances/one server exists—MCOD ties the same type of databases within different SAP system landscapes together. With MCOD, all Development databases used by your R/3, SRM, CRM, and Workplace implementations can be one and the same. Similarly, all Test databases across R/3, SRM, CRM, and Workplace can be bundled together, too, as illustrated in Figure 3.3. Note, however, that in many cases SAP AG frowns on mixing OLTP and OLAP systems, or combining different databases within the same system landscape. In that regard, forcing an MCOD database server to host your R/3 system's Development and Test databases would therefore be unsupported and contrary to best practices.

Figure 3.3 A properly architected sample MCOD deployment is displayed for a typical mySAP enterprise consisting of R/3, CRM, SRM, and Workplace.

As we move forward with our basic understanding of SAP system landscapes, and seek to understand how your SAP solution vision impacts and is impacted by your landscape decisions, my hope is to achieve the following:

All these design and planning approaches I cover tend to come into play in one manner or another across all mySAP implementations. It's how they are weighted or addressed that makes one system landscape different from the next.

After spending time with hundreds of customers and SAP implementations, I think it is safe to say that when all things are equal, the desire to simplify emerges as an important driver. Simplification takes many forms, too. In the case of the SAP system landscape and how it fulfills our SAP solution vision, the desire to simplify manifests itself in any number of ways:

Figure 3.4 Multiple SAP instances can be installed and configured on a single physical server, oftentimes reducing both acquisition and systems management costs down the road.

Although simplification tends to work in one direction by encouraging a "do more with less" philosophy, our next topic goes the other route in that it purposefully introduces complexity and differences between various systems within a system landscape—high availability.

When it comes to high availability, many technology professionals automatically think about what it means to improve the availability of a particular system or hardware component—thoughts of basic HA offerings like clustering or redundancy come to mind. With regard to the broader topic of how your solution vision impacts your SAP system landscape, though, high availability equates to the following:

To read more about how business requirements relate to high availability, see "Availability Planning—Documenting Requirements and Key Drivers," p. 167 in Chapter 6.

All companies implement a method of addressing Disaster Recovery (DR), whether or not they actually realize it. Even companies that do not add a dedicated DR system to their system landscape address disaster recovery. That is, their de facto disaster recovery plan simply reflects the challenges and timeframes surrounding rebuilding their SAP system from scratch, restoring from their latest tape backup, and imposing upon their end users to manually rekey any new business transactions lost between the last successful tape backup and the point at which the disaster occurred. This doesn't sound like much of a "plan," of course, but it does represent a baseline against which all other disaster recovery approaches and solutions can be weighed.

A host of DR approaches are discussed throughout Chapter 6, from those involving disk subsystem data replication solutions, to various clustering solutions, to database and mySAP-specific tactics. But when it comes to sifting the potential layout of your SAP system landscape through your solution vision, two general approaches fall out:

Both approaches are valid, and the first is more traditional. But I believe that the time and expense related to setting up, configuring, keeping current, and managing your own DR system explains the recent increase in outsourcing I've seen over the last two years.

To review some of the tasks and considerations inherent to addressing DR internally as opposed to outsourcing it, see "SAP General Availability and DR Best Practices," p. 207 in Chapter 6.

Companies that outsource the DR component of their SAP system landscape help to preserve their data, and access to this data, in that the outsourcer operates a completely independent data center, typically in a very different geographic location. For smaller and mid-size companies with only a single data center, the expense relief is tremendous. On the other hand, if the DR solution is maintained "in-house," so to speak, it will need to be housed in a separate facility. This alone is sure to drive complexity, cost, and even the architecture and makeup of both the SAP system landscape and its individual systems.

The SAP system landscape is directly impacted by the potential need to train SAP end users as well as the system's developers and technical support staff. Three different systems come into play, as illustrated in Figure 3.5:

Figure 3.5 These SAP training systems support the different needs of different organizations, from end users, to developers and programmers, to technical implementation specialists.

For details as to how the SAP system landscape satisfies the training needs of both the SAP Technical Support Organization and the production system's end users, see "Training and the Role of the SAP System Landscape," p. 314 in Chapter 9.

It can represent quite a challenge for the "customers" of one of these training systems to convince everyone that such a system is truly required. In my own experience, I have seen the lack of a Technical Sandbox really hurt an organization in terms of downtime due to botched infrastructure upgrades and changes to DR processes.

Another colleague of mine has more than once had to strongly push for the adoption of a Training system, too. Such a system allows for extensive informal user testing and practice outside of formally delivered training. He believes that this extra level of hands-on self-directed training is critical because your end-user community is best positioned of all groups to find business-process operational errors and limitations. And of course it is desirable to correct these issues well before Go-Live. But a consultant or even a senior super user is typically not positioned to push the adoption and use of a dedicated Training system. More often than not, it takes the SAP Steering Committee, the project's experienced management team, and the prodding of a knowledgeable SAP Solution Architect to do so. I cannot stress this enough—the risk is huge, in that you do not want to find out too late that not every business scenario works as it did during integration testing (for example, all types of contracts, all types of material movements, all kinds of accounting entries, and so on).

When it comes to evaluating your solution vision against the layout of your SAP system landscape, it is important to ensure that the performance of the systems meets the needs of their different end-user communities. Most of the time, of course, the focus is on designing, installing, and configuring a well-performing Production system. Performance considerations usually relate back to what an end user will experience while on the system, including

To read more about verifying that a Production system can meet performance expectations, see "Key SAP Stress-Testing Considerations," p. 580 in Chapter 16.

However, these same performance considerations apply to all of the other systems within the SAP system landscape, too. The Development system, for example, needs to exhibit excellent performance even while 25 or 50 or more developers are banging away at keyboards trying to build your custom mySAP solution. Similarly, your Test system needs to provide the performance necessary to get through integration testing. Even the Training system needs to provide adequate user response times so as to make the actual training experience more than something to be avoided.

High-performance considerations cover the gamut, touching every facet of every system within the landscape. This means that everything—from the performance of the network connecting each system, to each server's CPU, RAM, and disk configuration, to each system's OS, database, and mySAP component—must be addressed. Starting off on the right foot (with properly sized and configured hardware and software elements) is paramount, of course, but tuning all these solution stack pieces to create a cohesive well-running machine is just as important to achieving excellent performance. Like the weakest link in a chain, a single underperforming solution component will only throttle back the maximum performance otherwise obtainable from your system.

The need for scalability, like high availability and excellent performance, is addressed primarily through the sizing process. Scalability does not pay off up front in terms of improved system availability or better user response times, though. Rather, scalability is all about paying for "headroom" in your system, headroom that is not actually needed at present but might be required in the near future. In other words, scalability addresses future planned and unplanned growth in your system.

This growth can manifest itself in a number of ways. In my experience in the real world, I have seen the results of unplanned growth hurt companies where scalability was never addressed, as in the following cases:

Outstripping the capabilities of your current system such that a new platform is needed probably represents a worst-case scenario. Not only does the current Production component need to be replaced, but to support sound change control principles, so does the same component in your Test, Staging, and/or Technical Sandbox environments.

This is why hardware and software vendors tout things like "highly scalable system architectures," "enterprise versions" of particular Operating Systems and Database Systems, and so on—though not necessarily needed up front, the headroom that these approaches provide helps an organization feel more comfortable if they wind up growing faster than they expected. And hardware vendors in particular can position their SAP clients for improved scalability by practicing the following:

Hardware and software vendors alike spend a great deal of time "proving" how scalable their offerings are. As a first step, I suggest that benchmarks, customer references/feedback, and the results of tests published through white papers and other technical documents be reviewed by prospective mySAP customers. I also suggest that you begin considering new approaches to scalability. For example, HP's iCOD offering touts "capacity on demand." When a customer buys a server, for instance, it is fully populated with CPUs. The customer pays for only what is needed in the near term, however. Later, if it is determined that more processing power is required, the customer takes advantage of the in-place processors by merely applying for a license; no intrusive field upgrade or service call is required and therefore the need for planned downtime is drastically reduced.

More than anything else, Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) drives what a solution vision actually looks like at the end of the day, when a mySAP solution is implemented and really being used. Discussions on TCO might instead be labeled Return on Investment (ROI), or might fall under the heading of investment protection. Regardless, a focus on lowering TCO seeks to find less expensive solution-stack alternatives that still meet the needs of the business.

To read more about the relationship between TCO and your SAP solution vision, see "How the SAP Solution Vision Drives TCO," p. 127 in Chapter 5.

When all other things are equal, the following points apply from a hardware perspective:

Outsourcing your entire SAP infrastructure/operations team is another potential method of reducing TCO. In fact, outsourcing can represent the biggest potential TCO factor that a company will consider. At this level, though, outsourcing becomes more of a strategic business solution that impacts a lot more than simply TCO. True, outsourcing can cut labor costs by 50%, and enhance flexibility of a technical support organization to easily change as business requirements change, but there are drawbacks and disadvantages as well (discussed later in this chapter).

Another solution vision approach that impacts the SAP system landscape from both a configuration and TCO perspective is the use of an Application Service Provider (ASP). ASPs can drive lower TCO by virtue of their application-specific expertise, above and beyond that provided by in-house staff and traditional outsourcing providers. For example:

The ASP provider market shrank over the last few years. The mySAP-focused companies that weathered these hard times seem even better prepared and well-positioned to host SAP solutions, however.

I know of no company that does not envision protecting its corporate computing assets. From a solution-stack security perspective, not all software vendors are created equal, however. Oracle touts its unbreakable database, UNIX vendors tout the robust security features of their operating environments, and so on. In my eyes, security features are very important, but good security is more often about managing and testing changes to a solution stack, by carefully identifying security holes and other weaknesses in new solution stack components before these components ever find themselves in Production.

However, companies that embrace and act upon the idea of protecting computing assets will prove to be better partners in the long run. This is why I believe that Oracle's focus on security will pay big dividends in terms of slowing the adoption of competing databases. And it is why I believe that the Trusted PC joint Intel, AMD, and Microsoft vision (once labeled by Microsoft as Palladium, and now referred to as the "next-generation secure computing base for Windows") will prove fruitful as well. Its goal is to build security into servers and PCs at a microprocessor level. New initiatives coming out of the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance promise to better secure our processing platforms, ensuring that only authorized applications and program executables can ever be executed by the system, and that all data housed on the system is encrypted so that it is useless to others. To this end, Microsoft considers Trusted PC a significant part of its Trustworthy Computing strategy—we should see something commercially available in this regard by 2004 that applies to server as well as desktop and other computing platforms.

No customers of mine have ever started their initial SAP implementation planning discussions with me by saying:

By the time Go-Live looms just over the horizon, though, every single one of them—without exception—has indicated a growing concern for manageability. Sure, it's there on the project plan, and any number of products can be used to support managing your mySAP environment. But the whole field of manageability is more complex and more work than you would imagine. Consider the following:

To learn exactly how challenging piecing together a management approach can be, see "Systems Management Techniques for SAP," p. 511 in Chapter 14.

Because of the challenges inherent to managing hardware and software products from a lot of different solution stack vendors, some of my customers have purposely chosen less than "best-of-breed" products for their SAP solutions, so as to minimize the number of software partners involved. Or they have decided to reduce the number of partners and vendors altogether by selecting one of the big enterprise hardware/services vendors. The obvious partners are clear—HP, IBM, and Sun. For example, if you go with HP and choose to implement an rp8400-based server platform with an HP StorageWorks SAN, running HP-UX 11i, and managed by HP OpenView, the challenges inherent to managing four different vendors' products just dropped tremendously. Similar arguments could be made for going with an IBM or Sun solution stack, too—IBM even throws a couple of databases into the mix.

The last area I want to cover with regard to solution vision and the SAP system landscape is accessibility. Many companies over the last three or four years have started with a vision of dumping all application-specific interfaces in favor of browser-enabled solutions, so as to ease the burdens and costs associated with desktop/laptop management while opening up new accessibility approaches like hand-helds and other wireless devices. SAP has supported that vision since 1996, with the advent of Internet connectivity in R/3 3.1G. But only in the last few years have I really seen this take off.

SAP AG offers quite a few accessibility options today when it comes to mySAP solutions. The classic SAPGUI and its revamped and more capable EnjoySAP SAPGUI represent one end of the spectrum. This approach is safe, very mainstream, and very easy to implement. And the SAPGUI we have today is extremely comprehensive, supporting all mySAP components through a single interface, which is unlike the approach a few years ago where each so-called "New Dimension" product like BW or APO required its own GUI. But the SAPGUI still represents a typical application-specific approach to accessibility; each end user installs the client on their desktop or laptop, or runs the SAPGUI from a network share, and off they go.

Other accessibility approaches are available, however, as you see in Figure 3.6. The original WebGUI, for example, is based on HTML and provides connectivity via Microsoft's Internet Explorer and so on. And a more recent addition, the JavaGUI, allows native Java-based access to SAP. Both of these approaches fulfill an Internet-based approach to connectivity, and subsequently simplify the desktop (assuming Internet connectivity is a standard desktop offering at your particular company, of course).

Figure 3.6 Access to mySAP solutions is quite varied today, ranging from classic and updated SAPGUI options to newer Web-enabled versions.

Hybrid and all-SSD arrays can save money, when used in the right spots | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Price is considered a hurdle to deploying solid-state storage, but some organizations find flash systems can actually save money for specific applications.

That is especially the case for newer storage systems designed to take advantage of solid state at lower costs. Colby-Sawyer College in New London, N.H., spent an estimated one-third as much with a NexGen hybrid SSD array for virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) as it would have with traditional disk storage. And Fort Worth, Texas-based Aerospace Optics Inc. acquired a Nimbus Data S-Class all-SSD array for about 10% of what it would have cost to buy hybrid arrays from later vendors.

David Blaisdell, assistant IT director at Colby-Sawyer College, said he expects his NexGen n5 storage system to allow him to implement VDI storage for $28 per desktop. That figure is speculative because it is based on supporting 600 virtual desktops with one storage system. The college has less than one-third of that number of virtual desktops now, but Blaisdell said his testing indicates the SSD-powered NexGen has the horsepower to support all 600.

The first phase of Colby-Sawyer's desktop virtualization project includes 200 desktops. The college acquired 300 VMware View licenses, and Blaisdell said he has server hardware to accommodate 300 virtual desktops to get halfway to his eventual goal.

"We have plenty of performance for the 300, and I think one storage unit will give us all the capacity and performance for our target of 600 to 700 virtual desktops," Blaisdell said. "We're seeing a peak of 4,000 IOPS now when generating new desktops. But in testing with Iometer and Windows 7, we can push 25,000 IOPS with one virtual desktop. If we can get to 600 virtual desktops with one storage system, I'll be quite pleased. And so far with our numbers, it looks like we'll be able to do that."

Blaisdell said storage performance was his major obstacle for VDI storage: "We didn't need a big storage footprint in terms of terabytes, but we did anticipate a need for performance."

Colby-Sawyer's main storage is a Hewlett-Packard Inc. (HP) LeftHand SAN. Blaisdell said he considered adding more HP storage to get through the first VDI phase, but "we would have to come back 12 months later and add storage as we expanded. So, that's when we started looking at these other next-generation storage vendors that could provide higher performance."

Blaisdell realized flash would be required. NexGen uses Fusion-io Inc. ioDrive solid-state devices along with spinning disk in a hybrid configuration. He knew members of NexGen's team from their days with LeftHand, so he brought in an n5-100 system with 1.28 TB of solid-state storage and 22 TB of raw hard-drive capacity for testing. He purchased it about a month later, in May.

"If we had used traditional spinning disk and bought enough up front for 600 desktops, we would've spent three times what our budget was," Blaisdell said. "We would've probably purchased enough for 200 desktops for phase one, and then would have had to add more for performance."

The NexGen box remains dedicated to VDI, although Blaisdell said he may add another system for disaster recovery after the vendor delivers asynchronous replication. He will likely eventually use NexGen for SQL Server and other applications with high performance requirements, he said.

Michael Perry, vice president of information systems for Aerospace Optics, said he found Nimbus was a lower-cost option to mainstream storage vendors. Before looking at Nimbus, he said he was considering buying a hybrid EMC Corp. VNX with less than one-half terabyte of solid-state drives for more than 10 times what his Nimbus S-Class all-SSD array cost. Another alternative was to add flash to an underperforming NetApp Inc. FAS2020 array, but that would have cost $100,000 just for an additional 2 TB of flash.

"We're a small company. I just could not see going [to] the president again saying, 'You know that $40,000 I just spent? Well, I didn't get my money's worth. So now I want to spend another $100,000,'" Perry said. "EMC was in the range of $64,000 just to get less than half a terabyte raw. The Nimbus system cost $37,500 for 2.5 TB. You can buy 10 Nimbus systems for the price of an EMC box."

Perry said he began researching all-SSD arrays last November as part of a project to virtualize as many of Aerospace's servers as possible. He settled on Nimbus after talking to the vendor's executives at a trade show in April and doing more research afterwards. "My consultant got on the line with their CEO after the show and discussed their architecture. Our question was, 'Was it a true SAN from the bottom up, or PC-based with a bunch of drives in it?'"

Satisfied the S-Class is a true SAN, Perry installed a Nimbus system as storage for Aerospace Optics' frequently accessed enterprise resource planning (ERP) application, which uses a larger SQL Server database. He said the flash array reduced his SQL backup times from 18 minutes to three minutes.

Perry said he and his users are now hooked on flash. He uses his NetApp FAS2020 disk systems for backup, placing one at a colocation site and using SnapMirror to move server images off-site.

"I'm the kid on the motorcycle who's discovered he likes going 150 miles per hour, and he just can't go back to 55," Perry said. "Once you've had the speed and responsiveness of an SSD, you just don't want to go back. My people need their stuff up, and they need it to be responsive."

Perry has 24 production employees who hit his ERP server for training reports, videos and other high-resolution content, he said. "If the system wasn't responsive, you have 24 people waiting five seconds every minute. Before long, that adds up to $100,000 of lost productivity in a year."

Perry will likely add a second S-Class system soon, he said. "There's a saying in IT that you can never have too much bandwidth, too big of a display or too much storage. You can eat up storage fast."

Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

References :

Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11654293
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-12r
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/hp0-j36
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12155200
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/real-hp0-j36-questions-that-appeared-in.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/Pass4sureHp0-j36DumpsAndPracticeTestsWithRealQuestions
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/do9n4rv53wrsp9g3lg4jetic4361ind7
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/hp-hp0-j36-dumps-and-practice-tests-with-real-questions High Quality HP0-J36 products: we have our experts Team to ensure our HP HP0-J36 exam questions are always the latest. They are all very familiar with the exams and testing center. How we keep HP HP0-J36 exams updated?: we have our special ways to know the latest exams information on HP HP0-J36. Sometimes we contact our partners who are very familiar with the testing center or sometimes our customers will email us the most recent feedback, or we got the latest feedback from our dumps market. Once we find the HP HP0-J36 exams changed then we update them ASAP. Money back guarantee?: if you really fail this HP0-J36 Designing and Implementing HP LeftHand SAN and don�t want to wait for the update then we can give you full refund. But you should send your score report to us so that we can have a check. We will give you full refund immediately during our working time after we get the HP HP0-J36 score report from you. HP HP0-J36 Designing and Implementing HP LeftHand SAN Product Demo?: we have both PDF version and Software version. You can check our software page to see how it looks like. Killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99 DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders When will I get my HP0-J36 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. But if there is any delay in bank side for payment authorization, then it takes little longer. Source / Reference: http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11654293 http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-12r https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/hp0-j36 http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12155200 http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/real-hp0-j36-questions-that-appeared-in.html http://feeds.feedburner.com/Pass4sureHp0-j36DumpsAndPracticeTestsWithRealQuestions https://app.box.com/s/do9n4rv53wrsp9g3lg4jetic4361ind7
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000JFWV
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5r1nh0b997702b7db4e1fb89ca290bbf75a83
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/0049235269513653d8337